Thursday, December 10, 2009

Something has been planted


It’s true; something inside me has been planted. Or perhaps something that had begun to die has been nurtured and is on track to make a full recovery.



For the first time, I am sad that this class has come to an end. Honestly, I’m not sure if it’s the literature, Dr. Sexson, or my classmates. I feel privileged to have studied with such intelligent minds, beautiful minds, and emotional minds. It has been a pleasure to become enlightened to the perceptions of my classmates…the film students, the strictly Lit majors, the future teachers, and the students who took this class simply for the knowledge and enjoyment. As I have said before, literature is powerful. Literature is emotional. I believe that literature explains what science cannot begin to hypothesize. Today’s class ended unlike any class I have ever attended. It was sad. It was inspiring. I left feeling full and empty all at once.


I don’t know what to say about The Bible that hasn’t already been said. I wonder if it had a soundtrack, what songs would be played?


Songs of Bach that I enjoy: Sleepers Wake, Cello Suite No. 3


I feel like there is so much to say, but no words come to my mind. I don’t know how to describe the feeling in my gut that pokes at my heart…that spills tears from my eyes and numbs my brain. I can imagine that someone out there understands. Perfection really is everywhere; even in the cold shack I call my home, for I live on the sacred mountain.




Suffering Paper

In an attempt to fully convey the parallels of suffering in The Bible, Issac Bashevis Singer’s, The Slave, and the blogs written for Biblical Foundations of Literature it is nearly impossible to make any valid claims in a strictly formal report. Thus being said, the following text is revealed in both a formal and personal level to truly depict the effects of suffering and this emotions influence in literature and reality.


After a complete reading of The Bible and The Slave it is not difficult to identify the direct parallels between the Old Testament and The Slave. Throughout the Old Testament suffering is clearly depicted through multiple characters, cultures, and situations. Similarly, in The Slave suffering can be traced throughout the entire book by a close examination of the characters Jacob and Sarah (also known as Wanda, but for the entirety of this analysis will be identified as Sarah). It is also necessary to trace the suffering of non-fictional people and closely examine their strife in comparison to both biblical characters and fictional characters Jacob and Sarah. It is simply not enough to point out particular instances of suffering since it is apparent that the entire Old Testament appears to be book after book of someone, or even whole nations suffering. Instead, I am most concerned with the different levels in which people suffer. Does suffering and love parallel each other? Can one exist without the other? Can a certain sense of beauty be found in suffering that could not have been found without love?

Biblical Suffering

As previously stated, the Old Testament is filled with multitudes of suffering. Specifically, I find the suffering of Hannah (First Samuel), David (Second Samuel), and Job (Book of Job) suggests different levels of suffrage. In the book of First Samuel, Hannah is desperate to conceive a child and pray’s to God fervently, saying “O Lord of hosts, if only you will look on the misery of your servant, and remember me, and not forget your servant, but will give to your servant a male child, then I will set him before you, as a Nazarite until the day of his death” (1Samuel 1:11). In her suffering, Hannah’s genuine desires prompt her to mercifully praise God as she confesses her love to him. Is it because of Hannah’s true love for God that she suffers so greatly? Hannah seems to understand the love God has for her and she desires to return an equal love to God by raising a son who will also be a servant to God. Hannah suffers regarding the lack of something that she never had thus showing one can suffer without loss.

Job, a righteous man loses his home, family and health as a result of a bet between God and Satan. He is covered in boils and suffers from the physical pain, but also the pain of seemingly being rejected by God. Before Job’s three friends decided that Job is guilty of sin and is being punished “They sat with him on the ground seven days and seven nights, and no one spoke a word to him, for they saw that his suffering was great” (Job 2:13). Unlike Hannah, Job suffers because of what he has lost.

David, King of Israel is not exempt from suffering because he is God’s chosen leader. Like Job, his suffering is a result of having lost something and in this case it is two of his children. In my opinion two of the most emotional passages in The Bible are found in David’s response to having lost his kin. When God punishes David for committing adultery and intentionally placing Bathsheba’s husband in fatal danger he strikes the first born son of David and Bathsheba. David mourns his loss and when asked by his servants why he ceases to mourn David replies, “I can go to him, but he will not return to me” (2 Samuel 12:23). David suffers in being alone and having lost what he shall never be able to regain. Likewise, when Absalom, David’s rebellious son is slain, David publically weeps “O my son Absalom, my son, my son Absalom! Would I had died instead of you, O Absalom, my son, my son!” (2 Samuel 18:33). Through David’s lament one cannot help, but feel the emotions suffering in literature conveys to the reader as real emotion. David, like Hannah and Job suffers because he loves.

The Slave Suffering

Jacob, a Polish Jew survives the massacres and instead of death is sold into slavery and placed on a mountain as a laborer. “A passage from the Song of Songs came to his mind: Many waters cannot quench love; neither can the floods drown it. (Singer, 36)” In this case, Jacob’s suffering stems from an innocent love for God. When Jacob begins to lust for Sarah and eventually falls in love with the gentile “He murmured a prayer: “Lord of the universe, remove me from this world, before I stumble and arouse Thy Wrath... He had now become a man at war with himself” (36). Is Jacob’s love for Sarah and his devotion to God a direct cause of his suffering? Jacob’s situation, similar to Job’s, seems to create suffering thus alluding to the answer that without love one cannot truly suffer.

Sarah, a gentile converted to a Jew after falling in love with Jacob seems to suffer happily throughout the entire novel. I question if Sarah actually suffers more than Jacob because of her innocence. Her genuine love for Jacob and her desire to be Jew seem to lead her down a path destined to be filled with grief. How can sincere feelings of joy only result in suffering? Are people destined to suffer as a result of uncontrollable emotions and circumstances? Singer writes of Sarah, “Her only special merit had been the suffering which had set her apart from childhood: sorrow and longing had always been part of her” (215). After giving birth and shortly before her death Sarah says, “Be quiet, Jacob. My sorrow speaks, not I. I can no longer be silent” (218). It appears that in Sarah’s death her suffering overthrows her ability to control her human emotions; again showing the power of grief.

Although the novel is plagued with sorrow it is also a prime example of love and absolute devotion. I ask myself how can a story consume my mind with terror and my heart with sadness, yet delight all of my senses when I consider the undying love of Jacob and Sarah for each other and for God? After Sarah has finally passed Jacob “felt a love such as he had never known before, but equally a helplessness” (242). There is an underlying sense of beauty in the suffering experienced by Jacob and Sarah. It is paradoxical that beauty and suffering can be related, but without love one does not truly suffer and with love there is beauty.

Blog and Human Suffering

After reading Natalie Brandsma’s blog entries an undeniable correlation between her recent experiences and those of Jacob in The Slave became clear. Previously, Natalie lost her father to death while attempting to summit Lone’s Peak in Colorado. Natalie writes that it was another typical day with blue skies and the suns radiant beams shining on their faces. Moments before reaching the summit her father is instantly taken from his earthly life and Natalie is sent plummeting into the arms of suffering. Currently her sorrow continues from “the depth of loss, of love, and of life.”

My relationship with Natalie has allowed me draw upon the idea that both suffering and literature are powerful mediums to overcome sorrow and perpetuate joy. Coincidentally my friendship with Natalie formed eight years to the day that my own father passed away from the same murderer that took Natalie’s father; a massive heart-attack. Is it again coincidence that a heart-attack, the explosion of death through the chambers of a life-sustaining organ, is the factor that can send two young women down the mountain of happiness into the swells of grief? Or perhaps, it is the power of literature that can bring two strangers together to again learn to suffer less and experience the joy of life. In regards to suffering, I find solace as Natalie writes:

“I continue to speak to myself using climbing metaphors: remember to breathe, put one foot in front of the other, focus on the path in front of you, and in this way, just keep going until you reach the top of this mountain too. I'm not sure that there will be any sort of "summit" experience, but focusing on putting one foot in front of the other helps me to get through each day, minute by minute.”

Similarly, Lisette Langdorf has also recently lost a loved one. She shares that the loss of her boyfriend has been devastating and an unimaginable tragedy in her young life. Lisette compares her current emotional situation to that of Jacob’s as she writes, “There is nothing that I can do to bring him back, so I just have to take this day by day. Just like Jacob did. Day by day.”

It appears certain that with suffering comes loneliness. Job feels alone while in the company of his three friends and David is left alone while mourning for his lost children. Lisette is alone without her best friend, the man she was to marry and spend a lifetime with, and Natalie was left alone on the side of a mountain. Natalie writes, “I have always embraced aloneness, and I believe that loneliness is part of the essence of the grief process. Loneliness is a part of the definition of grief,” which strikes me as being similar to Jacob’s enslavement on the mountain. After narrowly escaping death he is left alone to labor for another man and labor his emotions, beliefs, and faith for God. Jacob, like Natalie embraces aloneness in order to grieve and recuperate.

Conclusion

In life and in literature suffering exists and is necessary in telling the story. One could not fully understand what it feels like to love another without knowing how it hurts to lose. One can also never fully know how much they suffered unless, like Hannah, they have felt a desire so great that it consumes their every merciful prayer. Although tragic, suffering is beautiful. Natalie blogs that with the anguish she felt after her father’s death came “a strange gratitude” because the emptiness that she feels is “so deep because the man who left it was so great.” Lisette understands that without having lost a part of her she would not have gained new relationships and the joy she has found in others she recently did not know. By losing Sarah, Jacob discovered what it was to truly love another besides God who he had loved innately his entire life. Although perhaps the most terrifying emotion, truly suffering is not a moment lost, but a lifetime of knowledge of love and beauty gained. Literature is power. Life is compelling. It connects fictional characters and situations to real life emotions and reminds us that we are not the only ones to endure such pain.

Monday, December 7, 2009

Samuel


If you find that it is the night before the final and you didn’t read the Books of Samuel and you can only remember David and Bathsheba’s love scene, as well as a bunch of red-stained cotton balls from the presentation…DON’T WORRY!  Here are some tidbits you might want to remind yourself of for the final.
Samuel - The last of Israel’s judges and the prophet who anoints both Saul and David as king. Samuel fulfills political and priestly duties for Israel, but he ushers in Israel’s monarchy mainly as a prophet—one who pronounces God’s words and decisions. Samuel’s stoic and aloof position in Israel allows Saul to struggle with God and his fate on his own.
David-  David is a strong but unassuming shepherd who becomes God’s choice to replace Saul as king of Israel. He is humble yet self-possessed, readily dismissing human opinion. His humility becomes clear early in his youth, when he kills the giant Goliath with a sling stone, declining the opportunity to use Saul’s royal armor. As king, his foremost quality is obedience to God. For example, when his wife expresses embarrassment at David’s dancing while he marches into Jerusalem, he rebukes her, boasting that he will embarrass himself so long as it pleases God.
David’s mercy to others displays his selflessness—a product of his strenuous commitment to ethical ideals. His sense of propriety is striking when he refrains from killing Saul while Saul has his back turned. David scorns the easy opportunity to attack because he feels it would be morally wrong to strike God’s current anointed ruler. As king, David forgives the kingdom’s traitors, and executes the traitors of his enemies. When his own rebellious son dies, David cries aloud in public, “O my son Absalom, my son, my son Absalom!” (2 Samuel 18:33). His weeping suggests the depth of a father’s blind love for his son.
David’s mercy may also be interpreted as a product of his political aspirations. David refuses to kill Saul because he senses that whatever standards he imposes against the current king may one day be used against himself as ruler. Moreover, seeds of revolt have already been planted in the northern tribes of Israel by David’s reign, and the kingdom’s unity may be on shaky ground. King David shows mercy to his traitors, especially Absalom, because he wishes to quell emotions and court the graces of all his subjects. By this reading, David appears to be a pragmatist—one who acts not out of his or her ideals, but on the basis of what is practical or expedient. However, the Old Testament ultimately seems to suggest that David’s religious ideals do not conflict with his pragmatism.
Saul - Israel’s first king. After God chooses Saul to be king, Saul loses his divine right to rule Israel by committing two religious errors. Saul acts as a character foil to David, because his plot to murder David only highlights David’s mercy to Saul in return. Saul’s inner turmoil over the inscrutability of God’s exacting standards makes him a sympathetic but tragic figure.
Has the Lord as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices,
as in obedience to the voice of the Lord?
Surely, to obey is better than sacrifice,
and to heed than the fat of rams. . . .
Because you have rejected the word of the Lord,
he has also rejected you from being king.

           (1 Samuel 15:2223)

Absalom - David’s son, who attempts to overthrow his father’s throne.   Absalom’s violent rise to power suggests that the evil that corrupts Israel comes from within.
Joab - King David’s loyal military commander. Joab serves as a foil to David’s successful combination of religion and politics. Joab’s reasonable desire to see justice and retribution delivered to the kingdom’s traitors emphasizes the unusual quality of David’s kindness to his enemies.
       Book of Samuel 1
  • Samuel’s Birth, Youth and Call to Be a Prophet (chs. 1–3)
  • Israel Defeated by the Philistines; the Ark of God Taken and Restored (chs. 4–7)
·         The people’s sinful request for a king (ch. 8)
·         Samuel anoints Saul privately (9:1—10:16)
·         Saul chosen to be king publicly (10:17–27)
·         Saul’s choice as king confirmed (11:1–13)
·         Saul’s reign inaugurated at a covenant renewal ceremony (11:14—12:2
·         Saul’s Kingship a Failure (13:1—16:13)
·         David enters Saul’s service (16:14—17:58)
The Rise of David…
  • David becomes alienated from Saul (chs. 18–19)
  • Jonathan protects David from Saul (ch. 20)
  • David continues to elude Saul (21:1—22:5)
  • Saul kills the priests at Nob (22:6–23)
  • David rescues the people of Keilah (23:1–6)
  • Saul continues to pursue David (23:7–29)
  • David spares Saul’s life (ch. 24)
  • David threatens Nabal’s life (ch. 25)
  • David spares Saul’s life again (ch. 26)
  • David enters Achish’s service (ch. 27)
  • The End of Saul’s Reign (chs. 28–31)
        Book of Samuel 2
  • David’s Lament over Saul and Jonathan (ch. 1)
  • David Becomes King over Judah (chs. 2–4)
  • David Becomes King over All Israel (5:1–5)
  • David Conquers Jerusalem (5:6–25)
  • David Brings the Ark to Jerusalem (ch. 6)
  • God Promises David an Everlasting Dynasty (ch. 7)
  • The Extension of David’s Kingdom (ch. 8)
  • David’s Faithfulness to His Covenant with Jonathan (ch. 9)
  • David Commits Adultery and Murder (chs. 10–12)
  • David Loses His Son Amnon (chs. 13–14)
  • David Loses His Son Absalom (chs. 15–20)